bhrashtacharr vidheyek

as the volcano of anti corruption bill rumbles has rumbled my lazy self in, to think wut the heck is this all about ..

after all wut we need to draft a sensible and effective bill, say any bill not necessarily the one with a particular nature to prosecute the big shots. A team of sensible people with this wisdom (being very basic) :

· A veteran with the judicial system who knows the judicial system in and out.

· A scholar who has grayed his hair(not necessarily) studying society and the its behavior as a entity.

· How can we forget the perfectionist with a penchant for complication who can interpret the in-human ( i mean beyond perception of a normal human) legal language: jo bhavnao ko samjhe and pen it down faithfully.

· A Dexter in subject of LAW.

· A veteran in subject of law a lawyer for that reason.

· and more than all these we need the lay man who knows nothing of these technicalities but he knows wut he wants and that too in single sentence i.e the purpose of bill is to root out corruption and establish deterrent so potent that freaks the shit out of the corrupt.

having said that we all know we have plenty of those in house (green house), the concept of running a government- nahh too big - running a ministry- emm still too big - ok wutever- is as absurd to them as it is to a undergraduate. Now this was one nasty remark, completely out of context and not required to faithfully convey the basic idea but i cant hold me from that.. ;) .

So finding a lay man in the house isnt big deal at all, we hav plenty but finding the one with integrity would be the task, a daunting one.

Wut we don’t need is big shots with big liquid and real-estate history any normal person who qualifies the above criterions partly/fully can be in.

A star professor form some university shall suffice for a person with thorough knowledge of Law and for that reason a scholar in Sociology and judicial systems.

Further we can find Lawyers retired judges unlike the big shots who are susceptible of having vested interests and therefore inappropriate as a member of draft committee.

At this point it is appropriate to say the argument doesnt necessarily means that all big shots are useless. some one exposing a obscure past of people like Bhushan,s and Hegde also indicates that their presence is threatening !

But then the fact strikes that ant venom is developed from venom itself... !

Shadee

why should a person get married..
after lots of discussions and introspection i cud figure out a few good reasons :

1 After a certain age it wud be difficult to find better matches because:
a) As we all know about the skewed sex ratio in India, most of the eligible  women are already committed by the time.
Assumptions: Women are not waiting too long to get committed as men  do, a girl is most probable to get married by 29 max. while a man may wait  up to 35max.
b) Most-eligible women would be picked up earliest so wuts left would be  lacking quality as well.

2 Even if we didnt knew the importance of algebra we did studied it accepting it  just as part of  system, while i was still thinking why we need to study this  boring thing , mathematics teacher had finished off the chapter. But some  how i managed to learn it. any way the point is algebra came out to be quit a  use full tool. Even though i didnt realize this when i was learning it. By this analogy in present day situation i have no idea why should i get married, but i can go ahead with it, accepting it just as part of system.

3 When i learn algebra i was able to realize the potential behind the stuff. may be if  i never did learn it the benefits of this mathematical tool would have been  unknown to me. The same analogy could be applied in this situation too.


Elaborated above are 3 good reasons to get married at this stage, even though am not getting the feel of it. But still, not convincing enough.....

may be i'll need some more time to figure it out...

Or just follow your heart. Will know when its time, to just take a leap of faith.